Judicial
More on Judicial
March 17, 2021
Today, Rep. John B. Larson (CT-01) voted for H.J.Res. 17, to remove the deadline for the ratification of the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA).
Issues:Human RightsJudicial
December 22, 2020
Representatives John B. Larson (CT-01), Rosa DeLauro (CT-03), Joe Courtney (CT-02), Jim Himes (CT-04), and Jahana Hayes (CT-05) secured historic investments for Connecticut in the fiscal year 2021 omnibus spending package and coronavirus relief deal.
September 25, 2020
During today’s Ways and Means Select Revenue Subcommittee Hearing on “Restaurants in America During The COVID-19 Pandemic”, Rep. John B. Larson (CT-01) called for restaurant relief in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic.
September 18, 2020
Rep. John B. Larson (CT-01) released the following statement on the passing of Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.
Issues:Judicial
August 21, 2020
Today, Rep. John B. Larson (CT-01) introduced a concurrent resolution to establish deliberate defiance of congressional subpoena by the President, Vice-President and other civil officers an impeachable high crime and misdemeanor.
Issues:Judicial
June 25, 2020
Today, Rep. John B. Larson (CT-01) voted for the George Floyd Justice in Policing Act.
Issues:Human RightsJudicial
June 9, 2020
Yesterday, Rep. John B. Larson (CT-01) cosponsored the Justice in Policing Act of 2020 that was introduced by the Congressional Black Caucus Chairwoman Karen Bass and the House Judiciary Chairman Jerrold Nadler today.
Issues:Judicial
February 26, 2020
Today, Rep. John B. Larson (CT-01) released the following statement on the House passage of H.R 35, The Emmett Till Antilynching Act.
Issues:Human RightsJudicial
February 12, 2020
Today, Rep. John B. Larson (CT-01) released the following statement after Attorney General Barr overruled career prosecutors in the sentencing of Roger Stone.
Issues:Judicial
June 11, 2019
Today, Rep. John B. Larson (CT-01) voted for H.Res. 430, a resolution to hold Attorney General William Barr and White House Counsel Don McGahn in civil contempt for refusing to comply with congressional subpoenas, and allow the House Judiciary Committee to enforce subpoenas in federal court.
Issues:Judicial






