Local reactions, debates ensue following President Trump’s address to Congress

Following President Trump’s joint address to Congress, reactions were swift and varied across Connecticut, with politicians from both sides of the aisle voicing their support and criticism.

The Tuesday night address, which clocked in at just shy of an hour and 40 minutes, provided a wealth of material for both lawmakers and residents to respond to, and it resulted in a heated debate that continued to unfold on Wednesday morning.

Facebook viewers shared a broad spectrum of reactions.

While some expressed support for Trump’s agenda saying “America is back,” others have voiced strong opposition, calling for more robust resistance to his policies.

The split in opinion was echoed by Connecticut’s political leaders, who shared their own reactions to the address.

One of the most significant points of contention was Trump’s claim that many individuals “as old as 150″ were fraudulently collecting Social Security benefits.

Rep. John Larson, a Democrat who represents Connecticut’s 1st District, and is a ranking member of the House Ways and Means Social Security Subcommittee, blasted the claims and called them lies.

Larson noted that the Trump’s statement had been debunked by numerous reputable sources, including The New York Times, Wall Street Journal, and major fact-checking organizations.

In a statement, Larson emphasized:

“Donald Trump has called Social Security a ‘scam’ and Elon Musk has called it a ‘Ponzi scheme.’ The real scam here is Donald Trump and Elon Musk lying to the American people so they can find $2 trillion in cuts to pay for their tax breaks for billionaires.”

Rep. John Larson, (D) Connecticut

Larson also called for an immediate hearing before the Ways and Means Committee to further investigate the claims and determine the truth.

“In a democracy, the way that is determined is through the public hearing process,” Larson added. He stressed the need for transparency and accountability.

Gov. Ned Lamont also offered his thoughts on the speech and urged Trump to focus on policies that would benefit everyday American families.

Lamont warned that the president’s tariffs on trading partners would further increase costs, especially in New England, where energy prices have been a significant concern.

He also expressed his concern over the proposed cuts to Medicaid and food assistance programs. Lamont described them as harmful to vulnerable populations, such as children, seniors, and families.

Despite his criticism, Lamont reiterated his commitment to bipartisan solutions, particularly in areas like energy costs, healthcare, and infrastructure.

He stressed that working together to lower the cost of living for Connecticut families should be a top priority.

Rep. Rosa DeLauro was equally critical of the president’s address. She called it a “vision for America that serves only the wealthiest and most powerful.”

DeLauro accused the Trump of prioritizing the needs of billionaires and large corporations while leaving behind the middle class, children, seniors, and working families.

She particularly denounced the Trump’s policies, which she argued would further hurt vulnerable populations, including the proposed cuts to Medicaid and public education.

DeLauro also highlighted the dangers of the Trump administration’s policies on education, particularly the cuts to special education and teacher recruitment funding.

She invited Connecticut’s 2025 Teacher of the Year, Julia Miller, to join her as a guest.

Sen. Richard Blumenthal also weighed in and criticized the president’s speech as “decidedly unpresidential.”

Blumenthal accused Trump of “touting false feats, fanning fears, and taunting Democrats.”

He further described the speech as existing in a “fictional world,” one that “pandered to prejudice and grievance” and was “untethered to reality.”

Blumenthal also took issue with the Republicans in attendance. He called their behavior “embarrassing” as they treated the address like a campaign rally.

Rep. Joe Courtney was another prominent figure who shared his opinion.

Courtney pointed out the economic consequences of the Trump’s trade policies, especially the ongoing trade war with Canada and Mexico.

Courtney emphasized that while Americans were hoping for solutions to improve their lives, the Trump’s speech was detached from the realities facing many families.

He also spoke out about the dismissal of federal employees, including veterans like his guest, Marine Corps veteran Gabriel D’Alatri, who was fired by DOGE just days before completing his probationary period.

Courtney stressed that such actions were unfair to the people who serve the country/ He called the termination of 6,000 federal employees, including veterans, a direct attack on those who have sacrificed for the nation.

In contrast, the Connecticut Republican Party offered a staunch defense of Trump’s speech. It claimed that the speech presented an “America First” agenda that prioritized the needs of all Americans.

“Tonight, we witnessed two starkly contrasting visions for America’s future. President Trump presented an America First agenda that prioritizes the needs and rights of all Americans, while Democrats stood in opposition, resisting progress at every turn. While Republicans work to protect women’s rights, end unnecessary wars, and lower the cost of living for everyday Americans, Democrats remained silent, offering nothing but sour faces and meaningless signs. President Trump celebrated our military, our sovereignty, our heroes, and a young child battling terminal cancer—symbols of the strength and resilience that define this nation. Meanwhile, Democrats sat in silent defiance of everything that makes America great. It’s never been more clear: the American people made the right choice in electing President Trump and Vice President Vance.”

Connecticut Republic Party

The party took aim at Democrats for their perceived opposition to the president’s policies and accused them of resisting progress and failing to offer viable solutions.

The statement emphasized the Trump’s focus on military strength, sovereignty, and honoring American heroes, while it criticized Democrats for not supporting those values.

In the wake of the varied reactions, Channel 3 continued to engage with viewers through its ongoing Vote Now poll.